求助帮我翻译一下

稀里糊涂

谢绝软件翻译
Countries are increasingly turning to E-Government——the use of information technologies(IT) such as wide area networks and the Interact---- to improve the delivery of information and basic services to citizens and businesses. They are realizing that E—Government can lower business costs and stimulate private investment.
  Some of the areas in which governments are applying information technology, such as business registration and license application，inspection clearance，customs modernization，tax administration，(e．g．electronic filing)，and procurement of goods and services.
E-Government has led to siginificant savings in terms of the time and cost required to cinduct daily transactions . By introduing transparency and accountability, it has also increased trust in government. For civil servants , however, E-Government offers a mixed bag:changes in management and leadship and retraining requirement.
Although E-Government has been around since the 1990s, many developing countries have not fully reaped its benefits because they lack the key conditions for it to thrive：healthy polltical and regulatory environments，well—developed IT infrastructure，and a large pool of  Internet users. Skeptics believe that E-Government is not an appropriate tool for low—income countries with Iimited technicaI capability. But some developing countries，such as Guatemala，have successfully implemented E—Government in certain areas，despite this shortcoming.
The hard truth is that no company enters a government office to pitch an accountability tool. In the United States a survey by the Center of Excellence in Government found that most citizens wanted E—Government to deliver accountability. That surprised everyone except the citizens In developed democracies where transparency and accountability is often assumed，so little has been done to significantly open up government in ways that would really expose wasteful spending or promote real accountability.
Without democratic intent and political desire to use E—government tools to enhance democracy and public trust in Government via transparency，government as a whole will not benefit. Poland stands out as a model with its Freedom of Information  Act which embedded the energetic use of the Internet into their rule of law with online information dissemination of, not just access to，local Government budget information. Within government，Prime Minister to Mayors and Local Councils to Parliaments will gain the most from a more accountable and transparent administrative branch.
Given the appropriate context，all sectors of government would benefit in terms of transparency from the implementation of E-Government tools. Transparency allows making better  decisions by breaking up the narrow circles that apply themselves to the task of policy making and，in case of failure, as a rule, make the wrong choice：instead of broadening the circle involved in decision-making, they increase the level of secrecy，a breeding ground for more failures.

[ 本帖最后由 稀里糊涂 于 2008-6-3 00:14 编辑 ]

名字不要太长

国家是。。。

rd52331314

白痴~~~~~英语

enzo1215

汗了~~

不懂

谢绝了

角落晨曦

国家越来越转向对信息技术(它)的E-Government——the使用例如大范围网络和交互式---- 改进信息传送和基本服务到公民和企业。
They意识到E—Government可能降低企业费用和刺激私人投资。
政府申请信息技术的某些区域，例如企业注册和货物和服务的执照application，inspection clearance，customs modernization，tax administration， (e．g．electronic屑子) ，and获得。
E-Government导致了siginificant储款根据时间和费用需要对cinduct每日交易。
By introduing的透明度和责任，它也增加了在政府的信任。
For公务员，然而，电子政府提供杂集：在管理和leadship和再培训要求上的变化。
Although电子政府从20世纪90年代，许多发展中国家不充分地获得了它的好处，因为他们缺乏它的关键条件对thrive：healthy polltical和管理environments，well—developed它infrastructure，and互联网用户一大群。
Skeptics相信电子政府不是为low—income国家的一个适当的工具以Iimited technicaI能力。
But某开发的countries，例如Guatemala，have顺利地实施了在某些areas，despite的E—Government这个缺点。
The坚硬真相ls公司不进入政府机关投责任工具。
In美国由成就卓越中心的一次勘测在Govemmem的发现多数公民要E—Govemment提供责任。 那使大家惊奇除了透明度和责任是小的assumed，so经常做极大开放govemment用方式真正地将暴露大手大脚的消费或促进真正的责任的被开发的民主的公民。整体上Without民主意向和政治欲望使用E—government工具通过transparency，government提高民主和在goverument的公共信托社不会有益于。
Poland并肩作战象与埋置对互联网的精力充沛的用途入他们的法规与网上信息传播的它的报道自由的一个模型行动，通入to，local govemment不仅预算信息。 市长和地方委员会的Within government，Prime大臣对议会将达到最高从更加有责任和更加透明的管理部门。政府适当的context，all区段将有益于根据透明度从电子政府工具的实施的Given。 透明度准许做出更好的决定通过破坏努力于制定政策and，任务在失败的情况下，概括来说，做错误choice：而不是扩展在政策制定介入的圈子，他们为更多失败增加secrecy，a繁殖场的水平的狭窄的圈子。

黯然L销魂

楼上的很强。。。。。

流星雨

除了软件 。。我。不会

求学1子

出了汉字，我都不会~~

陪你踏雪

直接用google 的在线翻译么｀！